Beyond equilibrium: re-evaluating physical modelling of fluvial systems to represent climate changes

Edwin R.C. Baynes (1) , Wietse van de Lageweg (2) , Stuart Mclelland (2) , Daniel Parsons (3) , Jochen Aberle (3) , Jasper Dijkstra (4) , Pierre-Yves Henry (3) , Stephen Rice (5) , Moritz Thom (6) , Frédéric Moulin (7)

1 GR - Géosciences Rennes
2 University of Hull [United Kingdom]
3 NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim]
4 Department Catchment and Urban Hydrology, Deltares, Boussinesqweg 1, 2629 HV Delft, the Netherlands
5 Loughborough University
6 IMFT - Institut de mécanique des fluides de Toulouse
7 Technische Universität Braunschweig = Technical University of Braunschweig [Braunschweig]

The interactions between water, sediment and biology in fluvial systems are complex and driven by multiple forcing mechanisms across a range of spatial and temporal scales. In a changing climate, some meteorological drivers are expected to become more extreme with, for example, more prolonged droughts or more frequent flooding. Such environmental changes will potentially have significant consequences for the human populations and ecosystems that are dependent on riverscapes, but our understanding of fluvial system response to external drivers remains incomplete. As a consequence, many of the predictions of the effects of climate change have a large uncertainty that hampers effective management of fluvial environments. Amongst the array of methodological approaches available to scientists and engineers charged with improving that understanding, is physical modelling. Here, we review the role of physical modelling for understanding both biotic and abiotic processes and their interactions in fluvial systems. The approaches currently employed for scaling and representing fluvial processes in physical models are explored, from 1:1 experiments that reproduce processes at real-time or time scales of 10−1-100 years, to analogue models that compress spatial scales to simulate processes over time scales exceeding 102–103 years. An important gap in existing capabilities identified in this study is the representation of fluvial systems over time scales relevant for managing the immediate impacts of global climatic change; 101 – 102 years, the representation of variable forcing (e.g. storms), and the representation of biological processes. Research to fill this knowledge gap is proposed, including examples of how the time scale of study in directly scaled models could be extended and the time scale of landscape models could be compressed in the future, through the use of lightweight sediments, and innovative approaches for representing vegetation and biostabilisation in fluvial environments at condensed time scales, such as small-scale vegetation, plastic plants and polymers. It is argued that by improving physical modelling capabilities and coupling physical and numerical models, it should be possible to improve understanding of the complex interactions and processes induced by variable forcing within fluvial systems over a broader range of time scales. This will enable policymakers and environmental managers to help reduce and mitigate the risks associated with the impacts of climate change in rivers.

Mots clés: Fluvial; Climate change Physical modelling Review; Floods; Ecosystems

Domaines: Ecosystèmes; Climatologie

Edwin R.C. Baynes, Wietse van de Lageweg, Stuart Mclelland, Daniel Parsons, Jochen Aberle, et al.. Beyond equilibrium: re-evaluating physical modelling of fluvial systems to represent climate changes. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 181, pp.82-97. ⟨10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.04.007⟩. ⟨insu-01785426⟩